5-generation analysis based on pedigree data
| 0% | No common ancestors (ideal) | |
| 6.25% | First cousins | |
| 12.5% | Half-siblings / Grandparent | |
| 25% | Full siblings / Parent-offspring | |
| >25% | Multi-generational inbreeding |
| Ancestor | COI Contribution | Sire Paths | Dam Paths | Impact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CH (CRENSHAW’S) RODRIGUEZ’ GATOR ROM | 3.125% | 1 | 1 | |
| CH CRENSHAW’S JEEP ROM | 2.051% | 4 | 4 | |
| (GARRETT’S) WHITE’S TAB ROM | 1.563% | 1 | 2 | |
| (GARRETT’S) WHITE’S IRENE POR | 0.781% | 1 | 1 | |
| MARLOWE’S TABBY GIRL POR | 0.391% | 1 | 2 | |
| CH FINLEY’S BO ROM | 0.293% | 2 | 3 | |
| CH CRENSHAW’S HONEYBUNCH ROM | 0.293% | 2 | 3 | |
| GARRETT’S BRIDGETT | 0.195% | 1 | 1 | |
| MARLOWE’S MR. BULLDOG | 0.098% | 1 | 2 | |
| MARLOWE’S BRANDY GIRL | 0.098% | 1 | 2 | |
| CRENSHAW’S DOLLY | 0.049% | 1 | 1 | |
| DUPREL’S CHARLIE B | 0.049% | 1 | 1 |