5-generation analysis based on pedigree data
| 0% | No common ancestors (ideal) | |
| 6.25% | First cousins | |
| 12.5% | Half-siblings / Grandparent | |
| 25% | Full siblings / Parent-offspring | |
| >25% | Multi-generational inbreeding |
| Ancestor | COI Contribution | Sire Paths | Dam Paths | Impact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ISLER’S KATIE | 6.25% | 1 | 1 | |
| EDWARD’S STONEY | 4.688% | 2 | 1 | |
| BROCK’S SISSY BELLE | 3.418% | 3 | 2 | |
| CH EDWARDS’ CHINABUCK (3XW)(2XL) | 2.051% | 4 | 3 | |
| HALL’S DANNY BOY | 1.172% | 2 | 1 | |
| ROCCA’S RED DEE | 1.172% | 2 | 1 | |
| HALES’ MAYBELLE | 0.732% | 2 | 2 | |
| LOPOSAY’S RASCAL | 0.293% | 2 | 1 | |
| HALL’S BOOTS | 0.293% | 2 | 1 | |
| CH GARNER’S CHINAMAN (4XW) ROM | 0.293% | 2 | 2 | |
| WATSON&PEELER’S MISS KITTY | 0.293% | 2 | 2 | |
| EDWARD’S IDA | 0.146% | 1 | 2 | |
| EDWARD’S BILLY | 0.098% | 1 | 1 | |
| LOPOSAY’S BULLET II | 0.049% | 1 | 1 | |
| LOPOSAY’S SIBLE | 0.049% | 1 | 1 |