5-generation analysis based on pedigree data
| 0% | No common ancestors (ideal) | |
| 6.25% | First cousins | |
| 12.5% | Half-siblings / Grandparent | |
| 25% | Full siblings / Parent-offspring | |
| >25% | Multi-generational inbreeding |
| Ancestor | COI Contribution | Sire Paths | Dam Paths | Impact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TANT’S DUDLEY | 6.25% | 1 | 1 | |
| GR CH TANT’S YELLOW ROM | 3.516% | 2 | 2 | |
| TANT’S GLADY – D | 1.563% | 1 | 1 | |
| CH CHAVIS’ YELLOW JOHN ROM | 0.879% | 2 | 2 | |
| TANT’S MISS JOCKO ROM | 0.879% | 2 | 2 | |
| TANT’S GLADYS (POR) | 0.391% | 1 | 1 | |
| BASS TRAMP RED BOY ROM | 0.195% | 3 | 1 | |
| CH CHAVIS’ JOCKO POR | 0.195% | 3 | 1 | |
| MARLOWE’S RED FEATHER | 0.146% | 2 | 1 | |
| CHAVIS’ LADY ROSE | 0.146% | 2 | 1 | |
| CH CHAVIS’ JOCKO (4XW) POR | 0.146% | 2 | 1 | |
| TANT’S HOT STUFF | 0.098% | 1 | 1 |