5-generation analysis based on pedigree data
| 0% | No common ancestors (ideal) | |
| 6.25% | First cousins | |
| 12.5% | Half-siblings / Grandparent | |
| 25% | Full siblings / Parent-offspring | |
| >25% | Multi-generational inbreeding |
| Ancestor | COI Contribution | Sire Paths | Dam Paths | Impact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GR CH TANT’S YELLOW ROM | 6.25% | 1 | 1 | |
| CH CHAVIS’ JOCKO POR | 2.637% | 2 | 4 | |
| CH CHAVIS’ YELLOW JOHN ROM | 1.563% | 1 | 1 | |
| TANT’S MISS JOCKO ROM | 1.563% | 1 | 1 | |
| BASS TRAMP RED BOY ROM | 1.025% | 3 | 2 | |
| CH JACKSON’S HANK ROM | 0.586% | 2 | 3 | |
| RAST’S QUEENIE ROM | 0.586% | 2 | 3 | |
| MARLOWE’S RED FEATHER | 0.391% | 1 | 1 | |
| CHAVIS’ LADY ROSE | 0.391% | 1 | 1 | |
| TEAL’S JEFF | 0.195% | 3 | 1 | |
| MC LEOD’S SUSIE Q GAL | 0.146% | 2 | 1 | |
| BASS’ CAT | 0.098% | 1 | 1 | |
| CH CHAVIS’ LADY SASSY MEAD | 0.098% | 1 | 1 | |
| MAYFIELD’S DUKE | 0.049% | 1 | 1 | |
| BRYANT’S GIDGET | 0.049% | 1 | 1 |