5-generation analysis based on pedigree data
| 0% | No common ancestors (ideal) | |
| 6.25% | First cousins | |
| 12.5% | Half-siblings / Grandparent | |
| 25% | Full siblings / Parent-offspring | |
| >25% | Multi-generational inbreeding |
| Ancestor | COI Contribution | Sire Paths | Dam Paths | Impact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MIMS’ HANNAH II | 3.125% | 1 | 1 | |
| WOOD’S SNOOTY ROM | 1.709% | 4 | 3 | |
| HOOTEN’S’ SNAKE | 0.781% | 4 | 3 | |
| . MIMS SHORTY | 0.781% | 1 | 1 | |
| . MIMS’ HALF PINT | 0.781% | 1 | 1 | |
| MIMS’ HANNAH PATCH | 0.439% | 2 | 2 | |
| WOOD’S SNOOTY (2XW)(2XL) ROM | 0.391% | 1 | 1 | |
| ART’S MISSY ROM | 0.293% | 3 | 2 | |
| MIMS’ MOXIE | 0.195% | 1 | 1 | |
| ART’S MISSY (2XW) ROM | 0.098% | 1 | 1 | |
| GR CH NEEDHAM’S HANNIBAL (7XW) | 0.049% | 1 | 1 | |
| WELDON’S COMET | 0.049% | 1 | 1 |