5-generation analysis based on pedigree data
| 0% | No common ancestors (ideal) | |
| 6.25% | First cousins | |
| 12.5% | Half-siblings / Grandparent | |
| 25% | Full siblings / Parent-offspring | |
| >25% | Multi-generational inbreeding |
| Ancestor | COI Contribution | Sire Paths | Dam Paths | Impact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIT ISLANDS THUG | 4.688% | 2 | 1 | |
| TANT’S RED DEVIL POR | 2.344% | 2 | 2 | |
| TANT’S SINCO | 1.172% | 2 | 1 | |
| GR CH TANT’S YELLOW ROM | 0.586% | 2 | 2 | |
| CH S.T.P.’S SASSY (POR) | 0.586% | 2 | 2 | |
| CH CHAVIS’ YELLOW JOHN ROM | 0.391% | 2 | 4 | |
| TANT’S MISS JOCKO ROM | 0.391% | 2 | 4 | |
| BOURGEOIS’ TANK’S SISTER | 0.293% | 2 | 1 | |
| RBJBTKNL’S FLAME | 0.293% | 2 | 1 | |
| D. TANT’S SCOUT (1XW) | 0.049% | 1 | 1 | |
| PTOWN’S (TANT’S) BRANDYE | 0.049% | 1 | 1 | |
| CH JOE D’S RED PIRATE ROM | 0.049% | 1 | 1 | |
| DVN’S MISS BLITZ | 0.049% | 1 | 1 |