5-generation analysis based on pedigree data
| 0% | No common ancestors (ideal) | |
| 6.25% | First cousins | |
| 12.5% | Half-siblings / Grandparent | |
| 25% | Full siblings / Parent-offspring | |
| >25% | Multi-generational inbreeding |
| Ancestor | COI Contribution | Sire Paths | Dam Paths | Impact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FOSTER’S HARLEY | 3.125% | 1 | 1 | |
| RUDOLPH’S JASMINE | 3.125% | 1 | 1 | |
| WILDSIDE’S LUCIFER ROM | 0.781% | 1 | 1 | |
| WILDSIDE’S SCOOBY DOO | 0.781% | 1 | 1 | |
| SIN CITY’S DUKE | 0.781% | 1 | 1 | |
| PATRICK’S LITTLE BOO BOO | 0.781% | 1 | 1 | |
| CATES’ CUJO | 0.195% | 1 | 1 | |
| GR CH CATES’ NIGERINO (5XW) | 0.195% | 2 | 2 | |
| TOWNSEND’S BLACK WIDOW | 0.195% | 1 | 1 | |
| GARNER’S SNOOTY SHADOW | 0.195% | 1 | 1 | |
| GARNER’S WILD CHERRY | 0.195% | 1 | 1 | |
| (OTTER’S) MICKEL’S BULL | 0.195% | 1 | 1 | |
| OTTER’S PRECIOUS | 0.195% | 1 | 1 | |
| MURRIA’S MONTROSE | 0.195% | 1 | 1 | |
| PATRICK’S BOO BOO | 0.195% | 1 | 1 |