5-generation analysis based on pedigree data
| 0% | No common ancestors (ideal) | |
| 6.25% | First cousins | |
| 12.5% | Half-siblings / Grandparent | |
| 25% | Full siblings / Parent-offspring | |
| >25% | Multi-generational inbreeding |
| Ancestor | COI Contribution | Sire Paths | Dam Paths | Impact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CH (CARVER’S) DAVIS’ MIDNIGHT COWBOY ROM | 3.125% | 1 | 3 | |
| WALLING’S BULLYSON | 2.734% | 3 | 5 | |
| (CARVER’S) DAVIS’ PIGGY (ROM) | 1.367% | 1 | 3 | |
| LONG’S BABY POR | 1.172% | 2 | 3 | |
| GR CH HAND’S CANDY ROM | 0.781% | 1 | 1 | |
| BOUDREAUX’ ELI | 0.391% | 3 | 2 | |
| BOUDREAUX’ SPOOK | 0.391% | 3 | 2 | |
| CARVER’S JILL | 0.293% | 1 | 2 | |
| HUNTER’S TANA (CARVER) | 0.195% | 3 | 1 | |
| CH DAVIS’ CHIVO (-) ROM | 0.195% | 1 | 1 | |
| HUNTER’S SAM (CARVER) | 0.146% | 2 | 1 | |
| STEINBERG’S DIAMOND | 0.049% | 1 | 1 | |
| CARVER’S LITTLE POLLY | 0.049% | 1 | 1 |