5-generation analysis based on pedigree data
| 0% | No common ancestors (ideal) | |
| 6.25% | First cousins | |
| 12.5% | Half-siblings / Grandparent | |
| 25% | Full siblings / Parent-offspring | |
| >25% | Multi-generational inbreeding |
| Ancestor | COI Contribution | Sire Paths | Dam Paths | Impact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CH COTTINGHAM’S RED MAN ROM | 11.719% | 1 | 4 | |
| CH. COTTINGHAM’S BOOMER (3XW) | 2.734% | 1 | 3 | |
| COTTINGHAM’S GINGER | 2.734% | 1 | 3 | |
| BASS TRAMP RED BOY (2XW) ROM | 1.367% | 3 | 3 | |
| LANIER’S REX BOY | 0.586% | 1 | 2 | |
| CH SWINSON’S NORTH CAROLINA ROSE (3XW) | 0.586% | 1 | 2 | |
| MARLOWE’S BRANDY GIRL | 0.586% | 1 | 2 | |
| WHALEY’S RED EAGLE | 0.146% | 2 | 1 | |
| TEAL’S JEFF (1XW) | 0.146% | 2 | 1 | |
| MC LEOD’S SUSIE Q GAL | 0.146% | 2 | 1 | |
| MEDLINS’ GINGER GAL | 0.098% | 1 | 1 | |
| BASS’ CLEO | 0.098% | 1 | 1 |