5-generation analysis based on pedigree data
| 0% | No common ancestors (ideal) | |
| 6.25% | First cousins | |
| 12.5% | Half-siblings / Grandparent | |
| 25% | Full siblings / Parent-offspring | |
| >25% | Multi-generational inbreeding |
| Ancestor | COI Contribution | Sire Paths | Dam Paths | Impact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GARNER’S FRISCO ROM | 6.25% | 1 | 1 | |
| CH GARNER’S CHINAMAN (4XW) ROM | 4.102% | 2 | 3 | |
| (VINCE’S) ROMERO’S CHINA GIRL | 2.344% | 1 | 2 | |
| WOOD’S TROUBLE | 0.879% | 2 | 2 | |
| ABERNATHY’S MOLLY ROM | 0.879% | 2 | 2 | |
| HOBB’S TUFFY (1XW) | 0.586% | 1 | 2 | |
| HOBB’S SLICK | 0.195% | 1 | 2 | |
| CLAYTON’S ELI JR (2XW) | 0.146% | 2 | 1 | |
| CLAYTON’S SUGAR | 0.146% | 2 | 1 | |
| WOOD’S SNOOTY (2XW)(2XL) ROM | 0.146% | 2 | 1 | |
| (CARVER’S) HYDE’S BLOODY SUNDAY (2XW) | 0.146% | 2 | 1 | |
| PATRICK’S COMMANDER WHITEHEAD | 0.098% | 1 | 1 | |
| INDIAN BOLIO ROM | 0.098% | 2 | 1 |