5-generation analysis based on pedigree data
| 0% | No common ancestors (ideal) | |
| 6.25% | First cousins | |
| 12.5% | Half-siblings / Grandparent | |
| 25% | Full siblings / Parent-offspring | |
| >25% | Multi-generational inbreeding |
| Ancestor | COI Contribution | Sire Paths | Dam Paths | Impact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GR CH ANDERSON’S SUGAR | 10.156% | 4 | 1 | |
| RIGG’S RED BOY | 4.688% | 4 | 2 | |
| RIGG´S BLONDY | 2.344% | 3 | 1 | |
| PATRICK’S RED BABY ROM | 1.758% | 3 | 4 | |
| CH ANDERSON’S TONKA ROM | 1.123% | 4 | 1 | |
| PATRICK’S GOLDEN BOY | 0.879% | 2 | 2 | |
| RIGGS’ PEPPER | 0.488% | 2 | 3 | |
| RIGGS’ RED PEPPER | 0.391% | 1 | 1 | |
| INDIAN BOLIO ROM | 0.195% | 1 | 3 | |
| PATRICK’S GOLDY | 0.195% | 1 | 3 | |
| SHERWOOD’S MICKEY | 0.098% | 1 | 1 |