5-generation analysis based on pedigree data
| 0% | No common ancestors (ideal) | |
| 6.25% | First cousins | |
| 12.5% | Half-siblings / Grandparent | |
| 25% | Full siblings / Parent-offspring | |
| >25% | Multi-generational inbreeding |
| Ancestor | COI Contribution | Sire Paths | Dam Paths | Impact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CH REBEL’S SUNDANCE (ROM) | 3.125% | 1 | 1 | |
| (HARRIGER’S) MOUNTAIN MAN’S SPIDER BITEM POR | 3.125% | 1 | 1 | |
| (SHIVAR’S) LOPOSAY’S BUSTER ROM | 1.221% | 2 | 2 | |
| WALLING’S BULLYSON | 0.781% | 3 | 3 | |
| MORGAN’S SANDY (POR) | 0.781% | 1 | 1 | |
| CH MOUNTAIN MAN’S HOMER ROM | 0.781% | 1 | 1 | |
| MOUNTAIN MAN’S SUSIE (BENNETT’S BLACKIE) ROM | 0.781% | 1 | 1 | |
| ART’S MISSY ROM | 0.195% | 1 | 1 | |
| CH (CARVER’S) DAVIS’ MIDNIGHT COWBOY ROM | 0.195% | 1 | 1 | |
| (CARVER’S) DAVIS’ PIGGY (ROM) | 0.195% | 1 | 1 | |
| CH CRENSHAW’S RASCAL JR (TOJO) | 0.195% | 1 | 1 | |
| MARK’S MIDNIGHT 1 | 0.195% | 1 | 1 | |
| P. CARVER’S STOMPANATO ROM | 0.195% | 1 | 1 | |
| FLORES’ LADY | 0.195% | 1 | 1 | |
| BOUDREAUX’ ELI | 0.049% | 1 | 1 |