5-generation analysis based on pedigree data
| 0% | No common ancestors (ideal) | |
| 6.25% | First cousins | |
| 12.5% | Half-siblings / Grandparent | |
| 25% | Full siblings / Parent-offspring | |
| >25% | Multi-generational inbreeding |
| Ancestor | COI Contribution | Sire Paths | Dam Paths | Impact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CH CAROLINA KENNELS’ TERMITE ROM | 1.563% | 1 | 1 | |
| CHAVIS’ DANGEROUS DAN | 0.391% | 1 | 1 | |
| STEEN’S DELILAH | 0.391% | 1 | 1 | |
| ROBINSON’S BED BUG | 0.391% | 2 | 1 | |
| CH CHAVIS’ JOCKO POR | 0.195% | 3 | 1 | |
| GEORGE’S RED ACE | 0.195% | 1 | 1 | |
| CH CHAVIS’ LADY SASSY MEAD | 0.146% | 2 | 1 | |
| MEDLIN’S LIZZIE BELL | 0.146% | 3 | 1 | |
| CHAVIS’ BUCKY | 0.098% | 1 | 1 | |
| CHAVIS’ MARGARET | 0.098% | 1 | 1 | |
| (MEDLIN’S) TDK’S RED ACE | 0.098% | 2 | 1 | |
| GEORGE’S DANCER | 0.049% | 1 | 1 | |
| GEORGE’S CANDY | 0.049% | 1 | 1 |