5-generation analysis based on pedigree data
| 0% | No common ancestors (ideal) | |
| 6.25% | First cousins | |
| 12.5% | Half-siblings / Grandparent | |
| 25% | Full siblings / Parent-offspring | |
| >25% | Multi-generational inbreeding |
| Ancestor | COI Contribution | Sire Paths | Dam Paths | Impact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CH COTTINGHAM’S RED MAN ROM | 10.254% | 4 | 6 | |
| GARNER’S TRAMP REDBOY ROM | 6.25% | 1 | 1 | |
| GARNER’S GLORIA | 4.883% | 2 | 4 | |
| T.GARNER’S GINGER | 2.93% | 2 | 3 | |
| CH. COTTINGHAM’S BOOMER (3XW) | 2.051% | 3 | 4 | |
| COTTINGHAM’S GINGER | 2.051% | 3 | 4 | |
| BASS TRAMP RED BOY (2XW) ROM | 0.391% | 3 | 2 | |
| LANIER’S REX BOY | 0.293% | 2 | 2 | |
| CH SWINSON’S NORTH CAROLINA ROSE (3XW) | 0.293% | 2 | 2 | |
| MARLOWE’S BRANDY GIRL | 0.293% | 2 | 2 |