OFFSPRING 1 recorded
5-generation analysis based on pedigree data
| 0% | No common ancestors (ideal) | |
| 6.25% | First cousins | |
| 12.5% | Half-siblings / Grandparent | |
| 25% | Full siblings / Parent-offspring | |
| >25% | Multi-generational inbreeding |
| Ancestor | COI Contribution | Sire Paths | Dam Paths | Impact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CH HARVEY’S LUCIAS | 6.25% | 1 | 1 | |
| MARK’S PALADIN | 1.563% | 1 | 1 | |
| HILLIARD’S PEANUT PADDY | 1.563% | 1 | 1 | |
| CH HUGHES’ GATOR | 0.391% | 1 | 1 | |
| BREWER’S VINDY (MARK) | 0.391% | 1 | 1 | |
| HILLIARD’S SHAD RACK | 0.391% | 1 | 1 | |
| HILLIARD’S DINAH | 0.391% | 1 | 1 | |
| GR CH ADAMS’ ZEBO ROM | 0.098% | 1 | 1 | |
| HUGHES’ LONESOME | 0.098% | 1 | 1 | |
| BREWER’S VINDICATOR | 0.098% | 1 | 1 | |
| BREWER’S ROSIE | 0.098% | 1 | 1 | |
| CH SORRELLS’ GOOBER | 0.098% | 1 | 1 | |
| CH SORRELLS’ CRAZY SNOOKIE | 0.098% | 1 | 1 | |
| WOOD’S SNOOTY ROM | 0.098% | 1 | 1 | |
| MIMS’ HANNAH PATCH | 0.098% | 1 | 1 |