5-generation analysis based on pedigree data
| 0% | No common ancestors (ideal) | |
| 6.25% | First cousins | |
| 12.5% | Half-siblings / Grandparent | |
| 25% | Full siblings / Parent-offspring | |
| >25% | Multi-generational inbreeding |
| Ancestor | COI Contribution | Sire Paths | Dam Paths | Impact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ALLEN’S NINA | 6.25% | 1 | 1 | |
| GR CH DAVIS’ BOOMERANG (ROM) | 3.76% | 3 | 3 | |
| HURLEY’S SHABOOM | 2.441% | 2 | 2 | |
| GRAFFUIS’ HECTOR | 1.563% | 1 | 1 | |
| CARVER’S MISS SPIKE ROM | 1.465% | 3 | 3 | |
| CARVER’S PISTOL ROM | 0.732% | 2 | 2 | |
| (CARVER’S) DAVIS’ PIGGY (ROM) | 0.488% | 1 | 2 | |
| WALDROP’S WALDO | 0.391% | 1 | 1 | |
| SEMINOLE’S SUSIE | 0.391% | 1 | 1 | |
| CH TUDOR’S SPIKE ROM | 0.195% | 1 | 2 | |
| WOMACK’S MERT | 0.195% | 1 | 2 | |
| ELIAS’ PISTOL | 0.098% | 1 | 1 | |
| CARVER’S DEE | 0.098% | 1 | 1 | |
| CH E. CRENSHAW’S RENO | 0.098% | 1 | 1 | |
| WALLING’S BULLYSON | 0.098% | 1 | 1 |